To the Editor:
I write to take issue with Ashley Drinnon’s article, “One director, two centers, lots of problems,” as well as the headline used by editorial staff. The story highlights only two student voices, and in my experience, the loudest voices in politics usually represent the minority opinion.
As a former graduate assistant at the Office of Lesbian, Gay, Transgender, Queer and Intersex Life in the center’s first semester last year, I believe I can offer an objective view of the center’s leadership and programming. I have few reasons to go to bat for an administrator with whom I no longer work, and as my graduation approaches this December, I’ll be departing the institution soon enough. Without any reservation, I support Nora Spencer’s leadership ability and capacity to lead both the Women’s Center and the K.C. Potter Center simultaneously, and I challenge those who believe otherwise to take a closer look at her drive, passion and caring attitude toward Vanderbilt’s students.
Nora brings a perspective like no one else I have encountered in higher education, a field I study in my master’s coursework at Peabody. Her inclusive attitude, strong work ethic and ability to reach out to faculty and administrators across this decentralized university only adds incredible value to both centers. She has assembled an able team and actively engages with colleagues to improve the climate for both women and LGBT people at the academy. Vanderbilt and its constituents should be proud to have Nora here to initiate important discussions surrounding LGBT issues and to breathe new life into the Women’s Center, which was sorely needed.
After reading this article, it is clear to me the writer and contributing opinions are looking for controversy where none truly exists. I invite others to visit both centers, talk with the students that actually frequent the spaces, use the services and participate in the programming, and then, perhaps, we may have a balanced piece of journalistic writing. “Lots of problems,” at best, is misleading, and at worst, without merit and damaging to both institution’s reputations.
Andrew Moe
Second Year, M.Ed. Candidate in Higher Education Administration
Peabody College



