Full Story

Top 10 GOP Debate Performers


The Republican presidential hopefuls squared off Tuesday in Dearborn, Mich., to discuss primarily economic issues. For the first time, Fred Thompson joined the ranks of his fellow GOP contenders on the stage, but pundits were less than impressed with his showing. Who had the best performance though?

10. Tom Tancredo — This guy would probably do his campaign a service by staying out of debates. He has some very good points but will never do well until he learns how to answer a question on the spot.

9. Sam Brownback — He’s the most socially conservative candidate, but that doesn’t mean every answer has to involve family values, including those questions concerning other topics.

8. Duncan Hunter — Ditto Sen. Brownback, except for him, it’s national security.

7. Fred Thompson — The former actor was practically handed the nomination on a silver plate. He surged to the top of the polls without doing anything because the media played him up so much. He announced his candidacy last month and has lost significant support due to lackluster campaign organization. Then, on Tuesday, he was granted center stage to showcase his debate debut. But he squandered that opportunity as well, sounding unprepared and uninspiring. He still has time to turn it around, but not much.

6. John McCain — Make no mistake, Sen. McCain knows what he’s talking about on foreign and fiscal policy. He sounded very intelligent in his responses but seems to have lost his fire. Not to mention that with Thompson’s entry, he has been exiled from center stage. I’m amazed he hasn’t jumped ship on his failing campaign yet, unless he plans on going down with it.

5. Ron Paul — His non-interventionist spiel is starting to get old. In a debate concerning economic issues, you would hope he could stray from ideology for one minute to throw some stats out there, even if they are wrong. Hell, the others do it.

4. Mike Huckabee — He’s starting to sound like the GOP’s version of John Edwards, running an insurgent campaign on a populist strategy. He’s charismatic and often throws out the best one-liners. It’s nice that he finally came up with some new ones for a change.

3. Chris Matthews — Maybe it was the narrow scope of the debate, but Matthews did a great job of asking specific questions that kept the candidates on topics. Or maybe it was the absence of Tommy Thompson…

2. Mitt Romney — He did what he needed to do in this debate, as he very well should have. He has the most corporate experience and showed he grasps economic issues better than the other candidates. He took only a few shots at Sen. Thompson, but effectively marginalized his presence by taking on Rudy’s economic policy as mayor of New York.

1. Rudy Guiliani — While Gov. Romney is trying to make this a two-man race, Rudy has done a great job of styling himself as The Chosen One, sent from the heavens as humanity’s last hope to defeat the spawn of hell, Hillary Clinton.

Special Projects

Election 2008

View Print Versions

Hustler Print Version

Comments

On Mitt: You're absolutely

On Mitt:

You're absolutely kidding yourself if you think corporate experience equates to understanding the economics issues we face in this country. If you really want someone that understands our nations economy, Why not pick the only candidate that serves on the House Banking Committee? How about the one that actually makes the Fed answer to Congress about the status of our dollars value, creating credit and pushing interest rates to ridiculously low, artificial levels? Probably because the Media tells you he isn't one of the darlings, that he is a "fringe" candidate, right?

Frankly some of you wanna-be writer, blogger types terrify me with your complete lack of understanding.

Perhaps the fact that you

Perhaps the fact that you think Chris Matthews did a "great job" gives away your leanings. Perhaps you should state them up front. However, you really give several inaccuracies in your "top 10" which you simply don't, and cannot, support.

For instance, how was Fred Thompson "unprepared?" Simply because you disagree with him or dislike him, or even think he is "uninspiring" (and frankly, someone who likes Chris Matthews isn't exactly Thompson's target - his campaign is going for more intelligent people), doesn't mean that he was "unprepared." If you take a look at what most "pundits" say, they actually said that while he didn't steal the show, he did well enough BECAUSE he was prepared.

But you have shared falsehoods previously about Thompson, in your top 10 candidates who shouldn't be running article. It is a shame that the Hustler lets you write, frankly, because these articles are just downright stupid. Instead of intelligent articles arguing a position with facts and inferences, they're letting these stupid top 10 lists be published.

I guess it is easy for those who can't follow argumentation to read these. They even have numbers before them so that you can follow along!

On Fred Thompson...

The man has good ideas, and he has done good work in the past, but how you could deny that he is lazy boggles me. If you want facts, just look at his campaign so far. He announced the possibility of his candidacy in March, and then posted a video response to Michael Moore's movie on the Internet in May, which was clearly a publicity stunt (not saying he was right or wrong) to bolster popular support from his conservative base. Two weeks later he formed his exploratory committee, which made it clear he was running. He pushed back the date of his official announcement numerous times, from the 4th of July, to the end of the month, to mid August, until finally after Labor Day. He rarely campaigned, or fundraised for that matter over that period of time. Through Q3, he had only netted $11 million (and that counts June, when he already had a campaign in place.) That was his first quarter and despite all the excitement surrounding his campaign, his numbers paled in comparison to those of Rudy and Mitt's first quarter. Running a presidential campaign is a full-effort commitment, and he hasn't shown nearly what the other candidates have.

As I stated, he was given center stage at the debate, and the first question. He could have stolen the show, but failed to. Holding your own isn't an option for a frontrunner, and in that sense he had a poor performance. You have to put into perspective the expectations set for him, and the fact that this was the first time most people got to hear any of his ideas. First impressions tend to stick, and yes, while he did recover nicely later on, the fact that he didn't sound clear and authoritative at the start detracts from the overall performance.

I have nothing against Fred the politician, and I know he is very intelligent. Nonetheless, he blew a big opportunity in that debate, which is why I said what I did.

On a side note, I am not particularly a fan of Chris Matthews, or MSNBC. Just because Democrats are thrown softball questions in their debates doesn't mean the Republicans should be either. More difficult questions elicit more definitive responses from candidates, which is service to Republican primary voters.

Really?

How did you fail to note that the point was intervention overseas costs massive amounts of money and has the opposite effect of what is intended? That basically makes that money "wasted".

I guess all's fair in blogging and lack of understanding.

Ron Paul: A New Hope

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FG2PUZoukfA

For those who might like

For those who might like more info:
(1. National Threat) http://www.ronpaulnation.com/tv.html#controller_general_david_walker
(2. True cost of gas) http://www.terrarossa.com/?p=225
(3. America: freedom to Fascism) http://www.freedomtofascism.com
(4. The Secret Government...) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82g3KxcFuoY
(5. Truth about Giuliani) http://www.rudy-urbanlegend.com/
(6. CIA drug dealing) http://youtube.com/watch?v=1l31x-IIK4E
(7. Civil Liberties Lost) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8QwTKKSvR8&mode=related&search=
(8. Money Masters) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-515319560256183936
(9. Iraq War: Legal or Illegal) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Khut8xbXK8&mode=related&search=