On the surface, women seem to be doing pretty well in the United States. Hillary Clinton almost won the presidential nomination, and Sarah Palin could become the first female vice-president. Despite the advances women have made in the political arena, inequality between the sexes still exists in terms of equal pay for equal work.
Many people might be surprised to learn that pay inequity still exists in the U.S. According to the National Committee on Pay Equity, for the same work, women only make 77.8 percent of what men make. In terms of actual earnings, men make an average of $45,113 while women earn $35,102 — a difference of $10,000.
The above statistics hold true for all women, regardless of their backgrounds. Pay inequity actually increases as a woman’s level of education increases. Within a lifetime, women with high school diplomas will earn $700,000 less than men, while those with college degrees will make $1.2 million less than their male counterparts. This number jumps to $2 million if the woman is a professional school graduate.
These statistics represent a very slow closing of the gap between men’s and women’s wages. In 1963, when the Equal Pay Act became law, women could only expect to earn 59 percent of what men earned. In over 40 years, women’s pay has only increased by about 20 percent, which translates into about half a percent increase annually. This is pathetic, especially considering the fact that the U.S. is one of the richest nations in the world.
In addition to being (technically) against the law, pay inequity obviously affects women’s lives very negatively. Though women make less money than men for the same work, they still have to pay the same prices for goods and services. Because of this sad truth, women, especially single mothers, are hit the hardest when the economy does poorly.
Also, pay inequity can put women’s futures in danger. As the National Organization for Women notes, pay inequity “penalizes (women’s) retirement security by creating gaps in social security and pensions.”
Workplaces have obviously dragged their feet in reversing discriminative practices, and the government hasn’t done much to speed up the process either. A recent study conducted by the General Accounting Office at the request of three Democratic congressmen confirms the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliances, two federal agencies responsible for enforcing the Equal Pay Act, fail to ensure pay equity. While the agencies may take the initial steps to ensure equal pay, they fail to monitor progress in their investigations and do not fact-check the self-evaluating documents contractors provide them about salary policies.
While the government may have provided the framework to ensure pay equity, if it does not enforce its own policies, then the framework is useless. Apparently, correcting pay inequity based on gender is not one of our nation’s top priorities, though it should be. It’s embarrassing the American government demands equal rights for women in other countries but fails to fully provide them to American women.
There’s really no easy solution to the problem. It’s impossible to ensure that every employer in the country pays employees equally regardless of gender, and discriminative policies cannot change overnight. However, I think the government could make a little more effort to correct the problem of pay inequity.
Aimee Sobhani is a sophomore in the College of Arts and Science. She can be reached at aimee.f.sobhani@vanderbilt.edu.


"Pay inequity still needs to be resolved," by Aimee Sobhani
The urgency in the commentary makes me think the writer wants society to believe not just that "women earn less than men," but that EVERY woman earns less than EVERY man.
Here's a bit of the balance that has been omitted for over 20 years by pay-equity advocates and most journalists, who are trained to provide balance but don't and thus have only strengthened the advocates' beliefs and anger:
An excerpt compiled from "An In-depth Look at 'Pay Equity' For Women" at http://battlinbog.blog-city.com/male_matters_looks_indepth_at_pay_equity_for_women.htm:
Re: "Imagine doing the same job as a co-worker, but getting paid 23 percent less."
Everybody says that. But do you yourself personally know of any woman who works right next to a man in his exact same job, and, all things being equal, earns 23 percent less than he does? In your office, do the female managers, editors, and reporters earn 23 percent less than their male counterparts? Do the female bumper installers at GM, Ford, and Chrysler earn 23 percent less than the male counterparts working 18 inches from their elbow?
If so, why haven't these women, as members of the group taught to sue over the slightest grievance, long ago sued under the 40-year-old law mandating equal pay for equal work? And if they don't know they're making less, how does anyone else know?
No doubt many of the same people who insist women are paid 23 percent less also say employers are greedy profit-mongers bent on doing anything to beat out their competitors. If so, and if employers can easily get away with paying women less than men, why don't Michigan's troubled Big Three auto makers kick out all their male employees and employ only women at 77 cents to the dollar paid to the men? Think about it: they could immediately outsell Toyota and Honda by pricing their cars at 77 cents to the foreign auto makers' dollar. No more red ink! No more lay-offs!
Facts:
Women control most of the wealth.
Women control most of the spending.
Women live longer than men and in better health.
Men incur over 90% of workplace deaths and accidents. (This is the gender gap that is never discussed because of what I say below my name.)
See also:
“A PROMINENT FEMINIST GETS IT: 'You're Not Earning as Much as the Guys? Here's Why'” at http://battlinbog.blog-city.com/a_leading_feminist_gets_it_youre_not_earning_as_much_as_t.htm
“Lilly Ledbetter is not quite the feminist martyr she seems” at http://www.battlinbog.blog-city.com/the_fair_pay_follies.htm
"In large American corporations, 89 per cent of the professionals who opt to work reduced hours are women. Even when marriage and small children are not part of the equation, it seems that women are less willing on the whole to devote their lives to their careers. The glass ceiling may be, at least in part, a DIY job."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main.jhtml?view=DETAILS&grid=&xml=/arts/2008/04/27/bopin127.xml