The Hustler recently ran an article on a new bill that has been introduced in the Tennessee state legislature related to Vanderbilt’s nondiscrimination policy and the attorney general’s concerns about the bill’s constitutionality. Although this article was generally objective and fair, one line in particular stood out in my mind as blatantly false and in need of correction. When speaking about the nondiscrimination policy, the article says, “Christian groups have protested the policy, saying it forces them to allow nonbelievers and gay students to join.”
The concerns that were raised about the nondiscrimination policy had nothing to do with group membership or with homosexuality. Most, if not all of the groups, opposed to the policy already allowed any undergraduate to be a member, regardless of beliefs. They were and are very supportive of this part of the policy. In addition, no group was advocating or defending barring gay students from membership or leadership.
The part of the policy that we were protesting, however, was the fact that it clearly prevented groups from imposing faith- or belief-based qualifications for leadership. This prohibition was explicitly stated by the university in its official online explanation of the policy. Religious groups were not being allowed to require their leaders to share their organization’s basic beliefs. So some of these groups chose not to re-register. The protestation of the nondiscrimination policy was not about homosexuality. So let’s stop making it seem like it was.
— PJ Jedlovec is a senior in the College of Arts and Science. He can be reached at .





Rules of Conduct
Welcome to the discussion.
Or, use your linked account:
3 comments:
alex 12 posted at 6:33 am on Wed, Aug 28, 2013.
So some of these groups chose not to re-register. The protestation of the nondiscrimination policy was not about homosexuality. So let’s stop making it seem like it was.
alex 12 posted at 4:43 pm on Mon, Aug 26, 2013.
Tennessee state legislature related to Vanderbilt’s nondiscrimination policy and the attorney general’s concerns about the bill’s constitutionality.
alex 12 posted at 12:48 pm on Thu, Aug 22, 2013.
Being in the closet comes with infinite obligations. I've been there. I know that. But the reason you are closeted is not because homophobia exists.